Select Page

New CCM Premier: Thinner, Lighter, Faster to Ice

DSC_9680

By now goaltenders everywhere have probably seen the new CCM Premier line.

If you missed CCM’s unveiling in the summer, you’ve likely seen the new Premier in the NHL on stars like Roberto Luongo, Corey Crawford, Pekka Rinne, Marc-Andre Fleury, Ben Bishop, the recently re-signed Cam Talbot, or fast-rising rookie Connor Hellebuyck of the Winnipeg Jets. Maybe you’ve seen CCM Premier in the AHL instead, on prized young goalies like Montreal Canadiens prospect Zach Fucale or future Jet Eric Comrie, or maybe even in junior or college hockey.

What not all goaltenders have been able to see yet are all the improvements in the new Premier line.

Yes, the graphics are new. Yes, the brand name changed from Reebok to CCM. And yes, the new Premier is still designed and built by the same father-son team of Patrick and Michel Lefevre that changed the game with their first Premier pad. The CCM Premier is also part of an ongoing research collaboration with Western University, blending science with the Lefevre craftsmanship to make improvements in the pads that can be measured with hard numbers as well as feel.

The result is a new Premier pad that is not only thinner and lighter than any previous, but one that moved the weight around with a purpose, matching a shift in the balance point to a new strapping system that the science says gets to the ice faster.

5

The new CCM Premier in action with InGoal writer Greg Balloch. (Photo by Katie Lawrence/InGoal Magazine)

InGoal Magazine has been playing with the new CCM Premier line for a while now, working with our testers to match what the science says to how the gear feels on your leg. We will be rolling out previews like this one over the next two and a half months, outlining all those design changes that goalies everywhere haven’t yet been privy to, explaining the science behind them, and wrapping it all up with a full review when the line officially launches in early April.

Let’s start with the thinner profile and redistributed weight.

Lighter pads have been a trend for a while now, and the CCM Premier certainly achieves that with our 34+2 pad weighing in a half pound lighter than the 34+2 Reebok XLT Premier pad that InGoal tested two years ago. But the more important part may be how they moved the remaining weight around in the pad. First off, the change goalies probably can’t see on TV: The profile at the top of the CCM Premier pad above the knee is notably thinner than it was with the Reebok XLT.

By thinning out and lightening the top of the pad, the balance point shifted down to the boot. It doesn’t take a physics degree to figure out the part of the pad goalies have to move the most as they go up and down in the butterfly is the top, and since the bottom of the pad stays closes to the ice and is lifted the least, it makes sense to have more of the weight distributed there.

Is you can see from the inset photo of the Reebok XLT pad, the face of the new Premier is noticeably thinner, especially above the knee.

As you can see from the inset photo of the Reebok XLT pad, the face of the new CCM Premier pad is noticeably thinner, especially the thigh rise above the knee.

“It decreases the effort to recover out of a butterfly if you keep the majority of the mass of the pad closer to the foot,” said Ryan Frayne, a PhD Candidate from Western University who works on the industrial partnership research project between CCM and the school. “You’re not lifting as much mass up as high as you recover back to your feet or lift your knee.”

By re-working their foams, CCM also managed to shift the weight across the face of the pad, moving the balance point slightly from the center to the inside, closer to the bottom of the pad when a goalie is on the ice to help improve stability.

While the thinner profile allowed CCM to redistribute the weight on the new pad, it was important not to do it at the expense of the performance expected from the Premier line. More specifically, the Reebok XLT Premier was designed to produce harder rebounds, giving goalies more time to recover before the next shot. CCM’s designers, having seen other products get more bendable as the top of the pad got thinner, were conscious about not losing that property as they thinned out the top of the Premier. So as they changed the core of their pad, CCM used more HD foams in the new set up, ensuring the CCM Premier would maintain the same stiffness as the XLT, if not even be a little stiffer based on our early testing.

After all, the Premier was never intended to be a flexible pad. That’s why CCM started the E-Flex line.

DSC_9602The Premier pad is designed to be worn looser, to move around the leg rather than being cranked down tight to – and moving with – the leg the way the E-Flex is designed to. Maintaining those distinct properties to suit different goaltending styles was an important part of rebuilding the Premier core, combining a thinner profile and a redistributed balance point without sacrificing the stability and stiffness butterfly goalies have come to rely on from the line for more than a decade now.

There are other changes in the CCM Premier, including the aforementioned changes in the stock strapping system that work with the redistributed weight to get the pad to the ice faster, and a significantly improved knee cradle system as well. Look for those in coming weeks as InGoal continues to test the pad and match how it feels to why it was built this way.

In the meantime, enjoy a few snap shots from our early photo and testing sessions with the CCM Premier.

DSC_9805

11

Photo by Katie Lawrence/InGoal Magazine

 

DSC_9577

DSC_9531

DSC_9520

About The Author

18 Comments

  1. Joe Feeney

    This is what I want to read about pads and equipment. An explanation of the positive aspects of the and limitations of the pads is going to be helpful for those looking to purchase new equipment & those seeking to help others in getting the best pads for them.

  2. Lucas White

    when are they released in stores

    • nick

      I believe the article said they would launch in April

  3. M. Simon

    Are they made “overseas” ? say it ain’t so!

    • David Hutchison

      I’ve never understood the passion people have to knock overseas product anymore. There was time, yes. But…do you have a phone in your pocket? Overseas. Your computer, most of your clothing…etc. CCM doesn’t send an email with a design overseas and hope something suitable comes back. The same people who make the gear in Canada spend months in China training and supervising and ensuring quality control.

      • Kyle

        It’s not about the quality, but the choice to support a company that would rather spend and invest in a domestic work force, and keep a skilled trade alive in their own country. Rather than spending time and money training overseas workers to make a product they probably don’t care about or get paid enough to ever afford. Electronics have long lost that fight, but I would still choose to support a company that chooses to invest in their own countries well being and future. That’s why almost all of my gear is American made Vaughn, and when I can afford it, I’m getting a custom made set of PAW goalie pads. Because I appreciate being able to support an American, passionate in their craft, that I can have a relationship with, and get a 100% custom full set up for less than a pair of these foreign made leg pads.

      • Keith

        Mr Hutchinson. Yes its a World Market now and the quality has improved.
        I find it difficult to accept and pay premium prices for products made with cheap labor overseas.
        I would gladly pay $2,000.00 for Pads made in Canada, shipped from Canada
        than $2,000.00 Made in China shipped from Canada.
        All my gear is proudly made in Canada.

  4. Vince

    They look nice and I’m sure work well.
    I’m still kind of surprised that not more goalies are wearing the Warrior G-2 pads.
    They are more advanced than these (thinner, lighter, less straps, unique toe strap, …).
    Maybe it’s the cost of NHL sponsorship?
    Anyone have a comment about Warrior versus CCM?

  5. Bill

    will the JR sizes feature the same improvements? Going to be shopping for a 26+1 in early April.

  6. Ray Perkins

    Looks like they tried (unsuccessfully) to copy the Warrior Ritual G2…but nice try!

    • David Hutchison

      Actually, they aren’t close to the same product….not sure how you can say it’s an attempted copy by any stretch of the imagination.

      • Andrew

        Completely agree. Warrior pads felt like blocks of wood in the time I had them. Just zero feel while wearing them. Super stiff boot. Not much to like about them. Did Warrior pay guys to comment on this article? haha

        • Paul Ipolito

          Interesting comment on the Warrior pads. Every image I see of the Warrior pad looks to me as if it is a very stiff pad that would require a long break-in period. I don’t have a dog in this hunt, but a goalie living in my house couldn’t get the Warrior pads off fast enough while trying on a variety of the major brands. He preferred and purchased the CCM Extreme Flex. Each to his own, as they say.

  7. Rene

    April 8th is the release date

  8. Sean

    I like how the calf strap is much wider, I just hope they have them sewn in like Luongo’s setup, with that being said I would remove the knee block section that is on the inside of the pad. Also I would fix the calf strap that runs diagonally, I feel all the CCM’s have an issue in that department as the end on the knee block is always a bit higher. This is do to the fact that the strap itself raise the knee block in the section it runs. All in all, it is a great pad though!

  9. Josh

    Does anyone know the actual weight of these pads? I’m curious to compare them vs brains and the new G3.

  10. Jamie Blanchard

    Hi, looking to be added to goalie gear link ,JB

  11. Robert Robbins

    I bought a set of overseas and was very upset .. Had to sell and take a hit and learn a expensive lesson .
    There no where close.When people ask me i am very out spoken on good quality .
    U pay for what u get ….